Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM PARVEZ versus MST. WAHEEDA ANWAR

In section 115 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the Section 12 revision request was made by the plaintiff on the basis of the contract of sale, the suit case for the specific performance of the contract, the court ruled that the said order was against Review of Appeal preferred by Defendants was allowed The petition was filed by the Defendant on the basis that the Plaintiff was obliged to include all the documents which were submitted by the trial court I was introduced, and since he failed to do so, section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, 19 08 was not complied with and the request was not applicable. In accordance with the provisions of subsection (1) of 115, the CPC person obliged to file copies of the documents under the said section. And the plaintiff's order of the subordinate court failed to include all the documents with his request for review and tried to defend it by declaring it an act. The courts do not use their discretion in favor of criminal prosecution. The required documents were good to the knowledge of the plaintiff and during the trial phase evidence was presented that the land of the ignorant could not be ascertained. Who came to court in court. To exercise its discretionary power in its favor under Section 115, CPC, it must demonstrate its power, especially when the deadline for filing a review within this period has already expired. The above documents should be filed, in the circumstances criminal advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer