ABDUL LATIF versus SAFARISH ALI KHAN
O VII, R 2 The suit for recovering the claim of the plaintiff was that he had entrusted the defendant with the money in the dispute, and the documents were processed in that regard, but the defendant refused to refund. That the defendant alleged that the documents presented by the plaintiff in support of it were processed under the strictness of the claim and pressured that the defendant be charged to the defendant to prove such allegation. Was moved to, but was unable to produce any concrete evidence to support his claim, The plaintiff did not dispute the trial. The court, in the circumstances, rendered the verdict as the trial court had discussed all the evidence presented by both parties in its reasonable and broad decision and reached a correct decision by passing judgment and decision in favor of the plaintiff and Had said that the verdict and order had been properly confirmed. By the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Risalpur lawyer
