MST. ATIA ARSHAD versus THE BANK OF PUNJAB
Section 19 (7) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 The second objection to the application of the principle of Petition Res Judesta that the objector claimed to be the owner of the attached property was a contract to sell to the objector in whose favor He was later hanged before the affiliate order was approved. Instead of attacking the first object, the complainant had filed a second objection petition in the same premises, the banking court also dismissed the second objection petition when the earlier order was not challenged, then again According to the rule of the court, the final decision was taken, in the same premises the second application was stopped by law. Such facts were dismissed by the High Court Observer, who purchased the property in substantial quantities. And the verdict was not worth the money, the High Court granted two months time to satisfy the complainant on the order that his property could be saved so the appeal was dealt with in the terms mentioned above.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Mailsi lawyer