Find a Lawyer

M.A. (RECT) NO.488/KB OF 2003 IN R.A. NO. 180/KB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 28TH OCTOBER, 2003. versus M.A. (RECT) NO.488/KB OF 2003 IN R.A. NO. 180/KB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 28TH OCTOBER, 2003.

The Department's Appellate Tribunal Reference Request for Troubleshooting Sections 156 and 134 was timely barred because the Department's position as soon as the Department failed to file an apology request as well as That in the memo of the respondents, the Commissioner was Income Tax Cos III. But the appellate tribunal erroneously submitted a copy of the order to the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax COS IV under which the copy of the order was received by the Commissioner of Income Tax COS III and the period from which the commission of income was received. What was Taxes III and not from the date the order was issued to Commissioner Income Tax COS IV which was erroneously clear that it could be reformed. The correctly acknowledged position that the copy of the order was not properly presented to the defendant by the appellate tribunal. / The Department will therefore begin the period from which the copy of the order will be received by the Appellate Tribunal and the request for re-hearing has been fixed. top advocates from Murree lawyer