AGHA ABDUR RAHMAN KHAN versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHOLISTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BAHAWALPUR
Section Int Intra Court of Appeals Keeping in mind that the court decided the constitutional petition through an unreasonable ruling on the facts of the case and concluded on the basis of speculations, which was unnecessary by law and Second, it was not an injunction. This pointed to the fact that the subordinates of the Ba Nawab of Bahawalpur had the power of the law and were as good as the laws of any legislative assembly. The Constitutional Court had not only taken pains but had also decided the matter with reasonable reasoning. The judge must wear the laws of the land on the sleeve of his dress and determine whether the decree can be enforced that the Constitutional Court not only had to uphold the law, but also appealed to the appellate court itself. Had requested. In order to enforce the decree, the court was forced to try and investigate the facts and said that the decree, which is about one hundred years old and that the appellants were allowed It was prevented from raising the plea that the court goes into the factual aspect of the case. The verdict cannot come in the form of a legal solution unless the appellants remain silent on the basis of factual basis. For a very long time, and had never brought a case for the enforcement of the decree, despite significant events, the Constitutional Court denied the ownership of the claimant's land, in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
