NIAZAL ALIAS NIAZ ALI versus THE STATE
The defendant, on the basis of age, claimed that the age of the accused was 14 years and 8 months on the date of the incident due to the refusal of Section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 bail. Medical Certificate Reveals Her Age The accused was over 16 years of age at the date of the incident; the accused failed to show why the age of the accused should not be given according to the medical certificate, prepared by the accused. The Omar Certificate was issued by a medical certificate issued by a radiologist; Prior to this, the accused was not entitled to bail through judicial confession; the accused's request for bail was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Noor kot lawyer