Sections 12 and 27 (b) of the Transfer of Property Act (IV 1882), the specific performance of the contract to sell dwarf feeder buyers for section 41 valuable consideration, did not prove positively that the defendants had a contractual agreement. Was aware of. The resulting evidence was the most unlikely, and it initially seemed burdensome to prove that the disputed buyer was disputable to the disputed plaintiff. Defendants, on behalf of the plaintiff, were told nothing to oppose it and to prove that they knew the agreement in favor of the plaintiff, in any case, the plaintiff was not available to the plaintiff Failed to pay the obligation. , The High Court refused to interfere in the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
