SAKHI JAN versus THE STATE
Section 324/353 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7/25 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 evidence praised the policemen claiming to take part in the contest and the accused 7 7 Was arrested with a rifle. The witness and the direct witness of the same testimony said that the witnesses permanently established the acts of the accused, the version of the witnesses was, on the facts, contradictory, on the main points, but they had no lie. There was absolutely no reason for the accused to come to the record, suggesting that it was the purpose of the suggesting agency to create false witnesses against the accused. Prosecutor's evidence seems overweight and reliably impressive
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Daud Khel lawyer
