Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) evidence was appreciated in the dark of night and no source of light was disclosed in the FIR. The accused was the deceased's first cousin if the complainant was present on the occasion and designated the accused as He is the attacker. Particularly when the two sides were residents of the same village FIR, apart from being relevant, they said that the complainant had stated that a bullet was fired on the victim's person, while the private complaint contained one. The shoe, which was attributed to the three defendants, did not recover. During the investigation, the accused suffered tax advocates from Kalar Syedian lawyer