Find a Lawyer

SANAULLAH versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 34 34 Definition of evidence The three accused mentioned in the FIR were real brothers and one of them was on a motive, if any, with a fugitive suspect who suffered a fatal injury to the victim. Armed with a pistol at the scene, but he fired in the air, he should have fired at the deceased, who had allegedly insulted his brother, if he had shared a common intention with his contemporaries. Airborne and not in the air, the victim was fired on the accused and according to the complainant he also fired in the air. The defense incident happened in the sitting of the complainants, which was reported by Patwari, which showed that no bullet was found on the wall of the duck on the wall where the alleged incident took place and from the spot. No crime was taken away. patent advocate from Quaidabad lawyer