FAZAL-UR-REHMAN versus THE STATE
Definition of Section 5 (2) Evidence Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Evidence. The statement of the accused, which was supposed to be filed by the raiding magistrate after raiding under section 164, CCPC, was not recorded by which the persons ard persons said that the photocopies were and the date of their preparation. He said he was "neither captured nor referred to by the Circle Officer nor the magistrate in his statements through the memo, and the prosecution's witness admitted that he Standing on the road with the Circle Officer, neither moving the currency notes nor hearing the conversation, the complainant and the accused Investigate Was among the officers.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Noshki lawyer
