Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR KALEEM versus CITIBANK N.A. THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER

Section 9 (S) and 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. IX, R 13 Former Order, setting aside summons service, validating suit for restitution, filed against the latter on appeal. was done. The trial court ordered the default bank suit against the default bank payment in the credit card account against which the appellant filed a petition for reconsideration of the former party decree and delayed. Appeals were dismissed by an unknown order; the appellant challenged in the appeal that the appellant's position was that he was never summoned or that no copy of the claimant had been provided to him, Therefore, he could not be ordered to sue, and accepted his request to revoke the order. He should have, Suman services was implemented in different ways was affixed to the summons, was published in English and Urdu newspapers and were served by a courier service. The news that issuing a summons in an Urdu newspaper was defective because it was not being circulated on a wider scale would not be of any benefit as it had been provided under various methods provided under Section 9 (5) of the financial institutions. A legitimate service is being implemented against. , 2001 online advocate from Jalozai lawyer