SUB. (RETD.) MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ISLAMABAD
Arts 4, 24, 25 and 199 Constitutional Subdivision Distribution of Property, Islamabad Capital Territory Petitioner was deported from a rural land acquired by the applicant's Capital Development Authority, he and his brother. Request Allotment in one place and at the same time the Capital Development Authority allotted the applicant's brother a plot but the applicant refused. Valid Applicants applied timely, submitted prices, submitted affidavits and had been running from pillar to post since 1974, the applicant's plot case for allotment was identical to that of his brother but the Capital Development Authority applied. It was deafened on the request that the applicant be placed as such and that the same circumstances could not be dealt with in different courtyards.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
