SAMI-UD-DIN GHAURI versus L.D.A. AND OTHERS
Article 199 Amendment to the Law Ordinance (XII of 19723, Constitutional Jurisdiction of the High Court Scope Controversy Question; In fact if the contents of the constitutional petition and order approved by the Provincial Ombudsman are put to the facts, this is a matter of contentious question. I will bring the petitioner's case. In the constitutional plea, the fact and the High Court had no jurisdiction to settle the issue was in its favor to file a case before the competent court. But the applicant also dismissed the same applicant in front of the provincial Ombudsman. Under the circumstances, there was an alternative way of filing an appeal before the higher authority under section 32 of the Provincial Ombuds Act 1997. The constitutional petition was rightly dismissed by the High Court not authorized, under the High Court order. In the presence of any weakness or illegal act, it cannot be interfered with.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Goular Khel lawyer