AKHTAR MUHAMMAD versus AKHTAR HUSSAIN LANGO AND OTHERS
Section 52 Representation of People (Holding of Elections) Rules, 1977, 26 and 28 Election Request The nominee challenged the selection of a retired candidate in his election petition alleging that the Presiding Officer had directed his election agents to vote. Did not provide results for. Pro-Pharma, but the same was issued on plain papers and chit, in violation of R-26 of the Public Representation Rules, 1977, further alleging that the results of the three polling stations were in unanimous result. Was not counted, resulting in authenticity. Out of the three polling stations not included in the results, the applicant could not be allowed to seek any permission which is above his request, after the petition was not submitted. Pro-Pharma did not provide results, there is no evidence to support the allegations
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
