Find a Lawyer

FARID AHMED versus THE STATE

The witnesses were subjected to cross-examination of the value collection of the Arts 3/4 evidence, but they remained relevant to all material details, namely the presence, location and timing of the drug in question, whether the recovery witnesses testified. Neither declared any hostility nor during cross-examination. Nor in the statement of the accused under Section 2342, did the PC witnesses influence the trust and they were credible, there was no reason why the witnesses should be falsely involved in such a serious matter, because the prosecution should have Succeeded to prove the case beyond doubt. The trial court dismissed the sentence, the appeal against the sentence and the sentence imposed on the accused criminal advocate from Padidan lawyer