GHULAM HAIDER versus AHMAD KHAN
Article 13 and 20 Prior to sovereignty, the use of variations in evidence Rule of the former emperors claimed prematurely equal rights The trial court dismissed the case on the ground that at the age of 70 years One of the prince's witnesses, Omar, mentioned the wrong date and the wrongful name of one of the certified witnesses in the notice of Talab-e-Asud suit was dismissed by the trial court and the judgment and order passed by the trial court were passed by the appellate court. Source was retained. After such a long period, every date and such variation was natural because they were not described as a tape recorder, and not every human's memory was the same.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Mari Indus lawyer
