ABDUL REHMAN PATHAN versus THE STATE
Section (c) testimony of the evidence was sent to the chemical analyst with a delay of more than two months to the chemical property and no comprehensible justification for such delay was disclosed by the investigating officer and There was no record for the property being kept in safe custody during this period. Was left, as shown in the FIR and advisory, to reproduce a copy of the station diary, in fact The prosecutor's wagon registration number from which the accused was allegedly arrested was not mentioned in the arrest warrant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer
