MALIK NAUSHER KHAN LANGERIAL versus KHALID MAHMOOD CHOHAN
The re-counting petition petitioner, who lost the election by a margin of 51 votes, requested a re-counting of the votes. The Returning Officer was declared unofficially the winner, but in support of his claim that he failed to produce any concrete evidence, no reason was offered by the petitioner as the Returning Officer was not respondent / return Wanted to support the candidate, the correctness theory was attached to the record produced by the Returning Officer and it was the applicant's duty to prove, through solid evidence, that he was a fake, but the applicant did so. I was unsuccessful, but in the absence of solid evidence, it cannot be said that the Returning Officer's collusion. Candidates coming back was bent as a result of this.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
