MESSRS TRANSTECH LTD. versus MESSRS PAKISTAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD.
OXVII, R3 defense, demanding the dismissal of a case for non-production of evidence, provided many opportunities for the former defendant to present his evidence but at a later date when the matter was OV XVII, It was not clear if R 3 was excluded under CPC. The petition, which was adjourned, the trial court closed the evidence on the basis that the plaintiff failed to present evidence on consecutive dates, the accuracy where time was required for a party to present evidence or to take any further necessary action to proceed. Was. In this case, the provisions of A XVII, R 3 CPC will apply and will not apply unless the party has committed a default in the act for which the times under XVII Could not be done R 3 CPC on the date that was not set by the default party request
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Barbar Loi lawyer
