Find a Lawyer

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND 2 OTHERS versus NEELUM FLOUR MILLS THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR

O III, R 4, O XXVII, Rr 1, 4 and O XLI, Rr 17 and 19 Cancellation of Appeal Filing the latest Vakalatnama or presentation memorandum to the lawyer appearing in the private party filed 'Vakalatnama. While the Advocate appeared, the government had to submit a memorandum of appeal, but that would not change the status of the OO III Advocate Rule 4, the document signed by the CPC appointment party. I had considered filing in which there was a break or a memo. In terms of O XXVII, in relation to a private party will also be attracted to the principle of CPC, if a lawyer is present on behalf of the government then the latest appointment of the Advocate by the Government will not be necessary and the latest Vakalatnama or Memo. Will not be required for a reappearance appeal, if the appeal is already dismissed and a new approval question is not created for the appointment of a lawyer immigration advocates from Wana lawyer