Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, LAHORE

Sections 18 (1) and 31 (2), Proviso, (3) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), and VIII, R10 Explanation of the Land Returns Act 18 and 31 (2) of the cases of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Justification of the provisions of the court, in view of section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, returned the case under O VII, the judgment of R 10 CPC was approved by the trial court, the appellate court raised by the plaintiff. The plaintiff was that the plaintiff was granted without trial, the defendants stated that under section 31 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was a complete regulation and groundwater. The Acquisition Act, 189 There was no applicable legislation under section 31 (2) of 4. His wisdom had inserted section 3 in section 31 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which was laid down after section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. property advocate from Hub Inds Estate lawyer