TAHIR MEHMOOD versus THE STATE
Section 262626, the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), has done the same harm to the suspension of punishment to the accused, if not more than the injuries sustained by the prosecution, which has been the same strike by the prosecution which " Surrounded by 'Jafa'. And, the victim suffered severe injuries to his head that the doctor described as a hollow depth of the skull, the accused himself examined the oath and examined the defense witness, but the trial court Was completely unsuccessful in arguing. The defense plea and evidence were brought on record as the trial court, while discussing the defense, only observed that the defense had failed to shake the prosecution's version ??? Any further investigation by the trial court on the defense case or Defending such behavior was not properly argued. The conviction of the evidence accused was suspended, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Akhora Khattak lawyer