Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus AMIR AFZAL

AXVII, RR 2 and 3O XVII, dismissing suit, dismissing the plaintiff's CPC suit on this date after the trial under O XVII, R 3 CPC Gone when neither the plaintiff nor his lawyer was there. Although the appellant had been granted numerous opportunities to the plaintiff and failed to produce evidence, on the day of his death no one appeared for the plaintiff's case, which fell under the scope of O. XVII. Read with IX, R8 CPC not at all if the trial court intended to dismiss the case for illegal prosecution decisions, and the orders passed under both courts were without legal authority, the High Court upheld. The decisions of both the courts below were rejected and the case subject to payment of costs was remanded. For the trial, the trial court provided the final opportunity to present its evidence according to which it was allowed to be reviewed. list of supreme court advocates from Dir lawyer