Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus AMIR AFZAL


AXVII, RR 2 and 3O XVII, dismissing suit, dismissing the plaintiff's CPC suit on this date after the trial under O XVII, R 3 CPC Gone when neither the plaintiff nor his lawyer was there. Although the appellant had been granted numerous opportunities to the plaintiff and failed to produce evidence, on the day of his death no one appeared for the plaintiff's case, which fell under the scope of O. XVII. Read with IX, R8 CPC not at all if the trial court intended to dismiss the case for illegal prosecution decisions, and the orders passed under both courts were without legal authority, the High Court upheld. The decisions of both the courts below were rejected and the case subject to payment of costs was remanded. For the trial, the trial court provided the final opportunity to present its evidence according to which it was allowed to be reviewed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Shangla lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.