HABIB BANK LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEYS versus MUHAMMAD ABDUL SAMAD KHAN AND ANOTHER
Article 212 (3) Bank employees were not presented with relevant notification regarding competent authority as well as the steps taken by the department as well as the penalties imposed on the employees were good and the decision of the service tribunal was self-explanatory and complete Was based on its proper definition. There is no significant question about the facts of the Supreme Court, the law and the decisions, which are mentioned in this decision, the law of public importance which is considered to be involved in the petitions under Article 1212 (3) of the Constitution. Gone, they were rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Wan Radha Ram lawyer
