M. SHAHID GHAFOOR versus MUHAMMAD RASHID
Article 185 (3) A 67-day ban was imposed on a petition for breach, a delay was sought on the ground that the complainant had no knowledge of the decision of the High Court's explanation presented to the applicants. Because it was his duty to keep the complainant in alert for delay in passing of the High Court in a criminal case, which has gone awry, by applying for leave of appeal, the Court In addition to the process, the suspect had already gone through prison. Appeal for appeal was refused for almost five months before the High Court's leave order was passed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Chak Jamal lawyer
