CHIBHAR versus THE STATE
Sections 514, 87 and 88 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 were charged with forfeiture of a bond for which the applicant stood as a guarantor, he was absent and was unable to appear before the court. But the court was declared guilty and the bail bond was presented by the petitioner and canceled. The bail order was ordered as the accused was a police constable and the D-section PK bodyguard misused the privileges of bail and the applicant / bail, despite receiving several dates of hearing, was required to present the accused in court. I was unsuccessful who was absconding and was convicted. The bail was improperly bail. The bail against the petitioner's order / seizure filed by the applicant was rejected in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Ghotki lawyer
