MUHAMMAD NABI versus THE STATE
The delay in the definition of evidence in Sections 365A, 337F (ii) and 342 Criminal Code (V 1898), Section 164, would not be unacceptable in recording the confessional statement where the confessional statements of the various accused are voluntary and true. , Are permanent and are subject to prosecution and are supported by other evidence; they cannot be excluded on the basis of mere delayed recording.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Blitang lawyer
