Article Azad Azad Code of Conduct, 1984, R32 (2) of the Azad Azad High Court, Writ Petition was rejected in writing that only photostat copies of the documents were kept on record by the applicant and even without his appointment. The certified copy of the appointment order was also not available on the record by the respondent as the copy of the application provided by R 32 (2) of the Rules of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court 1984, although attached to the applicant There has to be, but in this case, the matter was completely different. The applicant stated that she was first in the test and interview according to the merit list, the defendants themselves had enrolled even after the applicant's pre-appointment, and hence the appointment of the respondent in the same post after the appointment. Was gone Respondents were not required by the applicant in such a situation to be attached to the writ petition containing certified copies of the documents entered.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
