The testimony of section 399 was not attributed to the accused for any explicit action, indicating that he made no preparations for the robbery commission to collect the accused with the accused involved in the forest. This would not indicate that he intends to commit the robbery. The State Adviser did not even support the verdict. The accused was given the benefit of the circumstances, and accordingly, he was acquitted. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
