MST. AYESHA BIBI versus NOOR
Clause & & & Title 42 Declaration for Sale Mutations Canceling Dhanshin Uneducated Female Plaintiffs' Case The seller refused to sell the suit in favor of the plaintiff and held that the sale mutation's endorsement was the result of fraud and misrepresentation but the suit The trial court dismissed, but the appellate court partially ordered one of the plaintiffs to the extent of the sale, which was trivial at the time of the sale transaction, while the other defendant dismissed the case in favor of a change of inheritance. It was affirmed by the plaintiffs that it was in accordance with the claims made by the plaintiffs. He was the one who, under the law, was an illiterate woman, including a male and female plaintiff, and was protected and the defendant failed to prove a good conscience in this case and also failed to prove it. It was alleged that the plaintiff was given free advice before recording the statements to the women regarding these changes
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Nowshera Cantt lawyer
