Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus THE STATE

Appeals filed by the defendants against the judgment of the Crisis App. Shariah Court did not expect that the Shariat court had dismissed the accused's case before his appearance, but the Supreme Court on merit, However, for the safe administration, justice had heard the accused's lawyer in detail that in the presence of police witnesses there was no basis for disclosing the recovery of marijuana from the accused, especially when the presence of an independent witness at the place of recovery. Was not even suggested. Through defense, the prosecution's witnesses did not allege against the police that they had a false claim or intent to involve the accused in a false case. The courts did not make false statements or The wrong evidence was presented which is the punishment brought on the record and the punishment for the offense. Stay in the situation pakistani advocates Jampur lawyer