MST. SHAZIA NADEEM versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, RAWALPINDI AND 11 OTHERS
Article 199 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 154 and 439 Refusing to file a constitutional petition, the applicant was deprived of possession of his legitimate property and home with the help of police and criminal associates and the petitioner's petition The petitioner was refused by the Additional Sessions Judge to issue instructions for filing a case in this regard, but despite the report of the inquiry officer in favor of the applicant, it was denied by an unreasonable order that the applicant's constitutional application Was not sustained because of the impugned order under Section 9439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Could be amended, the High Court's examination of the unclean order denied that this criminal code of conduct was not adopted under the provisions of 9 of98, and therefore, it was not renewable under Section 999 of the Code.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
