Suit for possession by trial before trial under Rule XVII, R3 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908) [Lahore High Court Amendment], O XVII, R1 (3) and XVII, R3 CPC Closed the defendant's evidence The defendant was that his father was admitted to the hospital and submitted a request for a stay in that regard, and the trial court did not grant his permission under haste, The plaintiff plaintiff specifically stated that her father was seriously ill and was admitted to the postponement. At the hospital, and a discharge card was also shown, therefore, reasonable grounds were available for the grant pending the order XVII, R 1 (3), CPC [Lahore High Court Amendment]. And the provisions of OXVII, R 3, CPC were not taken into account in keeping with the contents of the plaintiff's application. At stake; hasty and ill-founded orders lead to misunderstandings of justice and should be avoided by the administration of justice and cannot be knocked out by orders that were not guaranteed under the law. The features of the Justice High Court cannot be obstructed while changing the request for review in the Constitution. The application, allowed and directed that the defendant be given another opportunity to present evidence
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
