Section 8 claimed the possession of the plaintiffs was owned by his father and the defendant resided as his father's servant and was told that the property was transferred by his father to the plaintiff. The defendant was no longer the servant of the plaintiff's father. , They were asked to vacate the suit property, but despite giving them some time for this purpose, they failed to vacate it. The defendants opposed the claim that the plaintiff's father 70/80 years ago. The suit property was gifted to the accused's father and, being the successor of his father, the claim of the suit property owner's claimants was substantiated on the basis of the evidence on record, while the defendant filed his claim. Failed to prove.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
