Find a Lawyer

MESSRS BULK SHIPPING & TRADING (PVT.) LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Sections 16, 23, 156 (1) (9) and 168 of the General Clause Act (X9 of 1897), Section 24A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition for Occupation of Vandalism / Notice of Discrimination as Such Issuance of Notice Customs authorities According to customs officials, the vessel was found to be a vessel in the sea, due to the belief that the vessel falls in the definition of re-derelict of, in terms of section 168 of the Customs Act, 1969 Seized / Grounded, the Applicants appearing before the Collector as to why the notice which was issued to the applicants should not be prosecuted for violation of the Customer Act, 1969 That it took time to file a response to this cause notice and the applicants postponed it instead of submitting the reply to the collector. In the constitutional petition, it has been alleged that the showcase notice issued to him was invalid and illegal. That the vessel owners have neither left nor intend to leave the ship anywhere. The time and this authority had misidentified the vessel - the jurority show cause notice was issued to the applicants explaining why the vessel could not be considered as disconnected and said in response to the cause notice Voters should have provided evidence. In issuing the showcase notice, the authority made no definite determination regarding the status of the ship as the reason it was "nullified" because the constitutional petition was not admissible against the showcase notice as applicants already filed a response to show cause. Have sought the appropriate remedies available under the law by seeking time to do so. Notice applicants, in the circumstances, provide in the Customs Act 1969 best advocate from Mir Ali lawyer