Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

JAVED IBRAHIM PARACHA versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN


Constitution 40 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition did not give details of the alleged Pakistani dentures challenging the restoration of Pakistanis as supporters of the High Court as the affected applicant. Was not related to any dent or associated with the applicant. In any capacity, the petitioner did not believe how many dentis were released and how many were still in detention. The petitioner was unable to give the names and addresses of the freedmen and is still detained: Applicant disclosed to any personal interest. Had failed or was closely related to such a dentis petitioner according to Article 199 of the Constitution and could not provoke his complaint because the pro-judicial decision of the High Court, which rejected the constitutional petition, Was retained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Farooqabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.