ROZIE ALMEDIE versus ASIF ALI
Section 15 (2) (ii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 As per the contract stipulated in the payment of rent, the rent was to be offered by the 5th order of the month for the disputed period allegedly sent by money order. Was gone and that too with 33 days - Ten days after the 15-day hike was delayed the tenant did not submit a money order postal receipt in support of which the tenant did not check with the postal money so that the landlord could pay the tenant. Verify that the source refuses to publish a money order and confirm its coupon. Even the costs for the issuance of the notice to the Postman are maintained by the appellate court approved by the Controller of Rent, yet the decision was not subject to any illegal or material misconduct by the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. There was a basic need to make a decision. Application
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer
