Article 13 and 5 Pre-Ruling Tables for Occupation The Macbeth and Talab e Publication Petitioner accepted the orders of the lower courts on the basis that they had successfully proved the students and the lower courts had given evidence. The plaintiff claimed to have sought the plaintiff's claim but was neither present in Medina nor in the notice of Talab Eshad when the plaintiff received the notice of sale of the suit land. At that time or name was not mentioned to the person who conveyed the information to him, the defendant's witness did not say when, where or what date. And at the time, he informed the plaintiff of the transaction in question, the plaintiff's other witnesses only stated that the plaintiff considered himself a partner. The participant in the case and did not state that the plaintiff asserted that he would exercise his rightful sovereignty was not proved by such witnesses The dispute was contradictory to the history of his knowledge as alleged. , Which he claimed in 17 10 1997, while the sale was made on 14 10 1997, the plaintiff did not present postal receipts for sending notice to the petitioner. Defendant, although he prepared the receipt of the confession, the concurrent results of the courts below were in accordance with the law and the plaintiff's failure to prove the law in accordance with the law was revoked.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
