SHAH MUHAMMAD versus ATTA MUHAMMAD
Section 42 of the Trans42 Trans Property Property of the Property of Property of the Property of82 of the Property Act of the Act (IV of 1882), Section 118 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (2) for the declaration on which it is based. The exchange and modification of the approved exchange was rejected on account of non-payment of Rs. 75,000. The appellate court affirmed the trial court, but the exchange was dismissed by the High Court in the affidavit filed by the plaintiff and on the basis of which the approval of the conversion was not denied to the plaintiff, the plaintiff appeared before the registrar. At the time of the registration of the exchange, the alleged money was not demanded. Neither was any action taken to inform the Revenue Authority regarding the approval of any tax, nor was any fraud claimed on the plaintiff, nor was there any evidence that the payment of such amount in support of the fraud charges. Was not included in the exchange process was not disputed so payment of the amount cannot be undone the transaction can take appropriate remedy for the recovery of the money as the fact that the transaction is considered is a question. The matter cannot be resolved through re-evaluation of the evidence by the Supreme Court. Ltd deleted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Toru lawyer