The testimony of Section 9 was not explained in the delay of two months and in the sending of substances to the chemical expert from the accused in one day who had transported the substance to the chemical laboratory. Was not done The prosecution's allegations about the weight of the drug against the accused were different from the time, mentioned by the prosecution, whose weight was not listed in the chemical report, which included entry number 6 in court. The prosecution's failure to present the police station did not leave the police station due to the daily diary of the police station and everything was done at the police station. Despite the incident being a densely populated area, the police did not link the two esteemed advisers. Had taken The rest of the narcotics were not presented to the court throughout the court during the recovery process. The case involved material contradictions and doubts and the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
