COMMODORE (RETD.) MIRZA ASHFAQ BAIG versus THE STATE
Section 9 (a) (vi) / 10 There was no evidence on the testimonial record of the evidence to show that any excessive price was paid, thus the purchase of all three vessels, such as treasury or PN. No damage was done to the SC. The disruption record as a result of any type of purchase transaction also did not show that any favor was done to anyone or that any attempt was made with any body for the purpose of profit or gain. By way of which an attempt was made or was presented, the accused trial court had falsely proved itself to be wrong in saying that the prosecution had succeeded.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
