Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Section 6 and 14 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O VI, R 17 The plaintiff's modification of the plaintiff in a pre-emptive right to self-assertion asserts her claim of pre-discrimination rights based on three competencies. Was the foundation. The qualifications of Shafiq Shariq, Shafiq Khalit and Shafi Jir Sa were only recognized under pre-amendment law, which came into force in Azad Jammu and Kashmir in 1393 1993 and the present case was brought on 18-193. It appears that the pre-emption case was established. Decision on the implementation of the amended law was to be decided in light of the old law pending pre-discrimination cases when the appellate court observed that the case filed by the plaintiff is required to be decided according to the old law, the plaintiff's case is serious. Its final failure was to resort to plaint modification by entering the palace in the same word, and if the proposed modification was allowed after the expiry of the limits, it would be equivalent to adding or replacing a new land. Which was not specifically requested and this will of course change its cause. An action which was not lawful under the law was not allowed to amend, the circumstances on which it was brought were not being recognized by the old law, the appellate court filed by the plaintiff correctly rejected. Was. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mithi lawyer