MST. MARRIYAM BIBI versus KHAN MUHAMMAD
Section Contract Contract Contract Act (IX of 72 1872), sections 215 and 216, against suitland attorneys, permitting the defendant to exchange land, a parishioner and an uneducated woman, without any special authority of the principal of the principal. Denies the execution of a right-of-way lawyer. Both courts, respectively, rejected the case and appeal to exchange land with defendant's sons. Such an exchange of land created the doubt that a lawyer could exercise the rights and power of the landlord for whom a decision was made. The purpose of transacting without the owner / claimant who makes a conscious decision to exchange the transaction with the son of the general / lawyer who stands in a trust or trust relationship with another, is not allowed Can be given. In pursuit of your personal benefit, putting yourself in a situation wherein he may be prejudiced against the substance of the discharge is an agent of the trust or trustee's principal, and may exercise any confidentiality or any liability for the exercise of his powers. Cannot avail authority is always given to the agent to perform duties and duties as mentioned / mentioned in the authority document. If he has to exercise the option to his advantage, he has to seek permission from the principal. In the present case, the Dead of Attorney's ship did not mention the details of the plaintiff's property in order for the transaction to be entered into by the attorney. Neither the son nor the general counsel had any special authority in favor of the two courts did not examine the evidence, and it was not a matter of misrepresentation and reading of the evidence in which the lawyer had sent his sons
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Sihala lawyer