NASIR versus THE STATE
Injured witnesses, including section 324/109/337A (i) (ii) / 337F (ii) (vi) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) prosecution witnesses, gave evidence of delay in the registration case. ? The FIR clearly stated that the ocular testimony was entirely in accordance with the medical evidence; no illegal or misleading statements were identified in the prosecution's evidence in returning the conviction. The High Court had already granted the accused an exception in his sentence. The defendant was denied, according to the leave of the appeal, without intermittent verdict deserving of interference instead of running together
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Khewra lawyer
