MUSTAFA versus THE STATE
Section 10 (3) / 18 Definition of Evidence The statement of the prosecutor and his brother, as well as the recovery and investigation of the torn cloth, resulted in the case against the accused being proved beyond any doubt, the parties said. There was no agreement between them. Which was affirmed by him and his lawyer, but under section 18, the offense was read with section 10 (3) of the Adultery (1979) Ordinance 1979, for failure to do so The order could not be approved simply because of the agreement. The parties were interdependent and in this case a soft view could help reduce bad blood between them. Reconciliation and repentance were expressed by the accused as a mitigating circumstance of the case five Five years imprisonment accused The accused RI was confined to two years for the benefit of Section 382B, CR PC in two RI situations. with
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Mandi Faizabad lawyer
