SHAFAULLAH KHAN NIAZI versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD DEPARTMENT, MULTAN
Article 212 ()) Implementation of a major penalty by the Civil Service Authority when the competent officer did not recommend it after issuing a notice for a personal hearing to a public servant, after considering it, agreeing with the competent officer Provided the proper and appropriate reasons. The public servant was able to disagree with the validity authority's relevant documents and the recommended recommendation of the Defendant's order and could be subject to a larger sentence, which was considered legal because of the evidence in the record that the leave application for appeal. Was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
