Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR ALIAS ISTIKHAR versus THE STATE

Definitions of Articles 302 (b) and 324 of the evidence were filed without any timeframe in which the accused played a role in the commission of the complainant of the crime, the only eyewitness to the case. Had fully supported the prosecution's version. In spite of the lengthy information that cannot be affected, the testimony of the witness alone was not guilty or incompetent which led to the demand for his dismissal when otherwise it was an alarm of truth and inspiration. tax advocates from Pishin lawyer