Find a Lawyer

ASIM versus THE STATE

Section 2 (b (b)) of the testimony testimony, although there was an independent witness to the deceased who had no previous hostility to falsely implicate the accused, was not presented by the defense in the event of the complainant's presence It was also proved immediately by the person to whom the FIR was lodged that the complainant's statement was confirmed by another independent witness who had nothing to do with the deceased or the defendant spoke of the facts contradicting the medical evidence. And it was not enough to reject ocular testimony that encouraged confidence immigration advocates from Mehmood Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes