Find a Lawyer

ROZI KHAN versus TAZA KHAN

The amending jurisdiction of section 115 of the High Court scope record of the present case shows that the dispute between the parties was not necessarily imposed in connection with the son's share of the deceased, which would have required remand. Was. The daughters' appellate court's legal heritage waives its rights in favor of the applicants and the respondents on the remand of the case, thereby retaining their first verdict and order, passing the judgment on the appeal to the district judge. Had agreed. In keeping with the trial judge and the judgment and the decisions made, the trial court against the applicant held that the verdict was upheld by the orders of the lower and lower courts, serious misrepresentation and reading of the notice, such as the trial court. ; On remand, retained its previous judgment and decree without any satisfaction and the remand order was completely ignored by appellate court validation; both courts disputed the decision / parties 'facts regarding the parties' entitlement to their inheritance. Was searched for. Father, which the High Court cannot upset in its ideological jurisdiction, unless the lower courts have shown the evidence incorrectly or neglected any material piece of evidence when recording the facts or that the applicants Is a distorted discussion of The situation was repressed advocate from Mehmood Kot lawyer